AXJ
ACTIONS FOR JUSTICE ( AXJ ) welcomes you from anywhere in the world in real time 24/7/365 but you first must log in so that we know you are a member. Thank you. - AXJ www.axj.com

This is a private forum. All new members are requested to make at least ONE post within a week of your account being activated. The AXJ forum staff have taken these steps in order to safeguard our forum and its members using it.

You may want to do this in the Introduce Yourself area or during an AXJ chat in AXJ Chat area. There are plenty of places to post, even if it is just a hello message. Posting at least ONE message will let us know that you wish to keep your account. We fully understand that some members do not have the time to post on a regular basis but we feel this is a very reasonable request.

Any accounts that remains at 0 posts after one week will be deleted.

Regards,
AXJ Admin
AXJ REAL TIME NEWS 24/7/365 www.axj.com

AXJ real time news from its members 24/7/365. AXJ ASIA now with over 200,000 members. AXJ Members disgusted with useless wars fight for One World in Peace!

Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Most active topics
AXJ USA Save Matthew Moore

RSS feeds


Yahoo! 
MSN 
AOL 
Netvibes 
Bloglines 


Statistics
We have 13 registered users
The newest registered user is blackberryadeel

Our users have posted a total of 43 messages in 42 subjects
Keywords

Affiliates
free forum


AXJ Members ask? Is Facebook hijacking my email address?

Go down

AXJ Members ask? Is Facebook hijacking my email address?

Post  Admin on Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:24 am

AXJ Members ask? Is Facebook hijacking my email address?



According to an article published this morning by Julianne Pepitone @CNNMoneyTech, apparently there is a reason why Facebook obligates you to use your email address to log in, it is to carry out what is "known as a Man In The Middle (MITM) attack".

By signing in with your email address Facebook then turns around and sets up a parallel email on their servers @facebook.com to eventually get everyone to use Facebook for their private communications.

In theory no issue, only that now Facebook and the FBI can read the private and confidential email you receive before you do?

Actions For Justice ( AXJ ) Members around the world have become very concerned about this due to privacy rights violations and have tried to contact Meredith Chin, Facebook's manager of product communications, for further information.

AXJ would like to get your feedback on the matter and you can email us on our secure servers at: facebook@axj.com.

Read the article below:

Facebook is trying to hijack your email address


By Julianne Pepitone @CNNMoneyTech June 25, 2012: 6:08 PM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- If you're a Facebook user, you have a @facebook.com email address, whether you use it or not. Facebook is now automatically posting those addresses to users' profiles and displaying them as the default email address.

Cue the backlash. Facebook told CNNMoney the change has been rolling out for "a few weeks," but many users weren't aware of it until a spate of blog posts and news articles began drawing attention to it on Monday.

"Speaking of hating your users. Facebook forces everyone onto its email system. Really, Facebook?! Really?!" tweeted freelance tech journalist Ron Miller.

Blogger Gervase Markham, one of the first to draw attention to the change, was scathing in his comments on it.

"Facebook silently inserted themselves into the path of formerly-direct unencrypted communications from people who want to email me. In other contexts, this is known as a Man In The Middle (MITM) attack," he wrote, referring to a tactic hackers use to intercept electronic messages. "What on earth do they think they are playing at?"

Facebook (FB) seemed surprised by the reaction.

"We basically defaulted to show your Facebook address as we rolled this out, just to keep it consistent for everyone," said Meredith Chin, Facebook's manager of product communications.

She repeated the word "consistent" several times in her attempt to explain Facebook's rationale for the change.

It's part of a relatively new "Timeline" profile set-up process that lets users change their privacy settings for each post displayed on their Timeline page. The e-mail move "is similar to that. It's an additional visibility setting," she said.

Users can change the setting and show whatever email address they like, but by default, the visible address will be @facebook.com.

The change hasn't hit all accounts yet, but it will roll out eventually to all of Facebook's 900 million users, Chin confirmed.

That means many users will start getting email messages at an @facebook.com account they might otherwise never use.

That's the kind of change Facebook users tend to get very angry about when they're not warned in advance -- and it's something Facebook has a bad habit of doing. The site is notorious for its "mess up and apologize" approach.

Chin couldn't elaborate on why Facebook didn't communicate the email change before it happened.

"We as a company know we're always under a microscope, but sometimes there are certain things..." Chin said, trailing off. "Well, you plan for everything to be as loud as possible. But sometimes things come up that we need to be better about."

How to fix it: Users who want to stop the @facebook.com address from showing up on their profiles can do so by editing their "Contact Info" sections.

You have two options for any email addresses associated with your Facebook profile: "shown on Timeline" or "hidden from Timeline." By default, Facebook is setting your @facebook.com address to be "shown on Timeline" and hiding the rest. To change that, switch your @facebook.com email address to be "hidden from Timeline," and set a different email to be "shown on Timeline."

Facebook may "write a post about this, if there continues to be some confusion around it," Chin said.

But an after-the-fact blog post probably won't calm angry users, and it certainly won't staunch the ink that's been devoted to Facebook's move -- or the philosophy behind it.

Many articles characterized the change as a ham-fisted way for Facebook to push its email system, which it first announced in in late 2010. At that time the company said its goal was to integrate conversations across multiple channels of communication -- text messages, Facebook chat, email, etc.

Forbes summed up the conventional wisdom on Monday with a simple headline on its post: "Facebook's Lame Attempt To Force Its Email Service On You."

Facebook, of course, doesn't agree with that assessment.

"I'm seeing this whole meme around the idea that it's us pushing for people only to use facebook.com addresses," Chin said. "That was not our intention. We want people to use whatever's easier for them."

Source: http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/25/technology/facebook-emails/?source=cnn_bin
avatar
Admin
Admin

Posts : 40
Join date : 2008-11-22

View user profile http://axjus.board-directory.net

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum